Alexis Canter vs Jay Johnson-Hauldren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Oct at 11:35 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Canter vs J. Johnson-Hauldren

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Canter 1 - 0 Johnson-Hauldren
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alexis Canter winning 2 and Jay Johnson-Hauldren winning 0. The last match between Alexis Canter and Jay Johnson-Hauldren was at the M25 Sheffield, 19-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Alexis Canter getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Canter | 1 |
| Johnson-Hauldren | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M25 Sheffield(10-19-25)
A. Canter vs J. Johnson-Hauldren H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.67% (216-202) | Career Total W/L | 42.86% (3-4) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Canter vs J. Johnson-Hauldren Match Preview:
- How do Alexis Canter and Jay Johnson-Hauldren compare in second serve performance over the last six months? Alexis has a lower winning percentage at 38.46%, compared to Jay's 40.51%.
- In recent return game performance, Jay edges out Alexis by winning 44.16% of opponents' second serve points, while Alexis wins 39.06%.
- When it comes to first serve return points, both players have close performance, with Jay at 26.67% and Alexis at 25.27%.
- Under pressure, Alexis saves more breakpoints at a rate of 48.00%, compared to Jay’s 42.86%.
- Overall, Alexis has a higher match win rate over the year, at 57.14%, while Jay has won half of his matches at 50.00%.
- Hard courts are a favorable surface for both; however, Jay has performed better on hard courts than any other surface.
- Does the level of competition matter? Alexis competed against lower-ranked players (average rank 200.37), while Jay faced higher-ranked opponents (average rank 53.33).
- In deciding set scenarios, Alexis stands out with a 67% success rate over the last year, whereas Jay has had no wins.
Editorial Prediction (October 19, 2025, UTC):
The recent statistical analysis of both players reveals several key insights. Alexis Canter exhibits a relatively stronger record under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints than Jay Johnson-Hauldren. Alexis also demonstrates a superior performance in deciding sets, indicating a higher likelihood of success in close matches.
Despite Jay's modest lead in recent second serve performance and return stats, his overall win rate and inability to capitalize in deciding sets are concerning. Alexis's consistent performance and experience with a broader range of competition might give him the edge.
Considering the statistical nuances and their implications, Alexis Canter is the most promising candidate to seize victory in this upcoming match.
Alexis Canter vs Jay Johnson-Hauldren Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Canter vs J. Johnson-Hauldren H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:41:0 | Average Match Time | 1:41:0 |
| 73% (55/75) | 1st Serve % | 57% (31/54) |
| 64% (35/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 48% (26/54) | Return Points Win % | 41% (31/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Canter Recent Matches Played
J. Johnson-Hauldren Recent Matches Played

A. Canter vs J. Johnson-Hauldren Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.67% (216/202) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 51.93% (484/448) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.67% (7/8) |
| 51.23% (4577/4358) | Games Win/Loss | 52.70% (78/70) |
| 54.48% (146/122) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.33% (58/62) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 33.33% (5/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 810 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 488 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:8:14 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 325.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 292.14 |
| 63% (11430/18127) | 1st Serve % | 62% (164/264) |
| 67% (7630/11430) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (105/164) |
| 49% (3265/6697) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (49/100) |
| 41% (595/1460) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (11/21) |
| 37% (6438/17427) | Return Points Win % | 40% (112/283) |
| 23.08% (3/10) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.59% (213/192) | Futures W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 52% (214/415) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 52% (51/99) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 45% (45/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 85% (223/190) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 15% (223/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 13% (195/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |